Mentoring programs Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4750 words

Mentoring programs - query Paper ExampleThis particular kind of loving work intervention is followed with similar programs all everywhere the world. Both individuals and organizations involved in monitoring are back up with such organizations as MENTOR/ case Mentoring Partnership and the National Mentoring Center. Furthermore, numerous corporations sponsor large-scale monitoring initiatives, which involve their employees. Mentoring programs are also supported by the government in 2003 alone President George W. Bush donated half a billion dollars for deuce new mentoring initiatives (DuBois and Karcher, 2005).Recently, mentoring has been approved as a serious approach to rehabilitate criminal offenders and reduce grade of recidivism. Mentoring has appeared in several legislation documents, from the Reauthorization of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency bar of 1992 to the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant of 2005-2006 (Walker, 2007). In the reauthorization of the origin al document, the Congress added a part G, in which mentoring was described as a useful tool for addressing juvenile delinquency. Since 1995, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) has administered its proclaim federal program, the Juvenile Mentoring Program (JUMP), designed to reduce juvenile delinquency, gang participation and school dropout rates.However, duration the field of youth mentoring experiences enormous growth in terms of practice, it still lacks theoretical foundations and research, authoritative for provided growth and development (DuBois and Karcher, 2005). It was non until late(a) years that youth mentoring has gained interest from psychologists, sociologists, educators, human development specialists and social workers. While the multidisciplinary character of youth mentoring may be beneficial for the fields knowledge base, it also poses a probatory challenge for both researchers and practitioners. Due to the disciplinary boundaries w hich limit researchers regular exposure to their colleagues work, it may direct tight to identify opportunities for synergy within and across different areas for inquiry. Consequently, in many cases they can go unseen and unexplored (DuBois and Karcher, 2005). In terms of practice, the difficulty in acquiring one-stop shopping for definitive accounts and its implications may result in a compromised capacity for intervention and policy efforts to benefit from available theory and research.Given all these concerns, it is crucial for scholars to provide the fast-expanding and progressing practice of youth mentoring with both theoretical foundations and research base. Furthermore, in the light of a recent increase in juvenile violence and high recidivism rates, it is essential to design appropriate measures of prevention, treatment and support of crime (Cord, Widom and Crowell, 2001). The FBI data reveal that in 2001 juveniles comprised 17% of all arrests and 15% of those that invol ved violent crime. In many cases criminal activity in adolescence leads to such consequences in adult life as homelessness, spirit abuse, and mental illness. Moreover, each juvenile offender that becomes a recidivist costs society approximately $1.7 to $ 2.3 million, not to mention great economic, medical, physical and psychological consequences for